Total References=8
IVFCPD Courses
This site is under development. Open QAPonline Open IVFDaily Open IVFCPD Open IVFBenchmark Open IVFLabOnline     Logon Register
Use as part of your clinics ongoing education program.

Please contact us if you are interested in contributing to IVFCPD
IVFCPD is undergoing a major consolidation-pages may change frequently.

Key Points

Day 2 IGF-1 and poor responders+ - Course ID:75 -
Course explores the relationship between a poor ovarian response to stimulation and the IGF-1 concentration on day 2 of the treatment cycle.
0 You need to be registered and subscribed to view these activities.
Primary Topic 149
3/09/2020 - [Last Updated:17/09/2020 10:45:48 AM]
0 Activity ID
18 Key Topics
8 References
0 Link Explores
0 Accrued Minutes


List of Key Points FILTER: Key Point Background Comments Limit by Reference: All 2739 2763 2738
There are 18 key points collected on this topic but you need to have a current subscription to access them

Notes relating to this Course.
There are 2 notes collected on this topic but you need to have a current subscription to access them

References related to Day 2 IGF-1 and poor responders -[8]
Forman EJ. In search of a new biomarker to predict poor ovarian response. Fertil Steril. 2020,113(6):1157. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.047
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.047 0 8674 True Read article ID:2738
Man L, Lekovich J, Canon C, Rosenwaks Z, James D. Cycle day 2 insulin-like growth factor-1 serum levels as a prognostic tool to predict controlled ovarian hyperstimulation outcomes in poor responders. Fertil Steril. 2020,113(6):1205-1214. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.111
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.111 354 8675 True Read article ID:2739
Reynolds KA, Omurtag KR, Jimenez PT, Rhee JS, Tuuli MG, Jungheim ES. Cycle cancellation and pregnancy after luteal estradiol priming in women defined as poor responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2013,28(11):2981-2989. doi:10.1093/humrep/det306
10.1093/humrep/det306 0 0 True Read article ID:2741
Polyzos NP, Tournaye H. Poor ovarian responders: to meta-analyse or not, that is the question. Hum Reprod. 2014,29(3):634-635. doi:10.1093/humrep/det426
10.1093/humrep/det426 0 0 True Read article ID:2742
Reynolds KA, Rhee JS, Jimenez PT, Omurtag KR, Tuuli MG, Jungheim ES. Reply: poor ovarian responders: to meta-analyse or not, that is the question. Hum Reprod. 2014,29(3):635-636. doi:10.1093/humrep/det425
10.1093/humrep/det425 0 0 True Read article ID:2743
Mutlu MF, Mutlu İ,, Erdem M, Güler İ,, Erdem A. Comparison of the standard GnRH antagonist protocol and the luteal phase estradiol/GnRH antagonist priming protocol in poor ovarian responders. Turk J Med Sci. 2017,47(2):470-475. Published 2017 Apr 18. doi:10.3906/sag-1602-111
10.3906/sag-1602-111 0 0 True Read article ID:2744
Chang EM, Han JE, Won HJ, Kim YS, Yoon TK, Lee WS. Effect of estrogen priming through luteal phase and stimulation phase in poor responders in in-vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012,29(3):225-230. doi:10.1007/s10815-011-9685-7
10.1007/s10815-011-9685-7 355 0 True Read article ID:2745
Yovich JL, Zaidi S, Nguyen MDK, Hinchliffe PM. Measuring IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 Profiles in Women Seeking Assisted Reproduction, Relationship to Clinical Parameters (Study 1). J Pers Med. 2020,10(3):E122. Published 2020 Sep 11. doi:10.3390/jpm10030122
10.3390/jpm10030122 0 8685 True Read article ID:2763

Copyright IVFCPD Pty Ltd
Contact IVFCPD at