This site is under development. Open QAPonline Open IVFDaily Open IVFCPD Open IVFBenchmark Open IVFLabOnline     Logon Register
Providing a source of professional credits.

Please contact us if you are interested in contributing to IVFCPD
IVFCPD is undergoing a major consolidation-pages may change frequently.
About
Support
Activities
Certificate


Key Points


IVF x ICSI Comparison for non (severe) male factor infertility. - Course ID:77 -
Code
SEP53+ [822]
Comment
While ICSI was initially developed for server male factor infertility that often resulted in failed fertilisation, more recent application has seen it applied to a number of non-male factor clients. This exercise reports on publications that have teste whether this is satisfactory.
Access
0 You need to be registered and subscribed to view these activities.
Primary Topic 53
Date
7/1/2021 - [Last Updated:11/4/2021]
Status
3
Information
Select for more information on Education modules.
Activity Date
Created 7/1/2021
Updated 11/4/2021
Enrolled
Last Visit
Last Activity
Contents
0 Activity ID
21 Key Topics
2 Comments
0 Questions
6 References
0 Activity
0 CPD Minutes

  References All   | Order: Author Year ID

List of Key Points FILTER: Key Point Comments
There are 21 key points collected on this topic but you need to have a current subscription to access them

Notes relating to this Course.
There are 2 notes collected on this topic but you need to have a current subscription to access them

References related to IVF x ICSI Comparison -[5] [Ref=6]
P R Supramaniam, I Granne, E O Ohuma, L N Lim, E McVeigh, R Venkatakrishnan, C M Becker, M Mittal, ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertility, Human Reproduction, , dez301, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez301 ID:2409
Year:0, DOI:10.1093/humrep/dez301 0 8436 Last edited on
Liu L, Wang H, Li Z, Niu J, Tang R. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization in couples with nonsevere male infertility [published online ahead of print, 2020 Sep 4]. Fertil Steril. 2020,S0015-0282(20)30426-X. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.058 ID:2752
Year:2020, DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.058 0 8680 2020 Last edited on
Grimstad FW, Nangia AK, Luke B, Stern JE, Mak W. Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2016,31(12):2750-2755. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew247 ID:2754
Year:0, DOI:10.1093/humrep/dew247 357 0 Last edited on
Haas J, Miller TE, Nahum R, Aizer A, Kirshenbaum M, Zilberberg E, Lebovitz O, Orvieto R. The role of ICSI vs. conventional IVF for patients with advanced maternal age-a randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Oct 28. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01990-5 ID:2869
Year:2020, DOI:10.1007/s10815-020-01990-5 375 8741 2020 Last edited on 30/10/2020
Isikoglu M, Avci A, Kendirci Ceviren A, Aydı,,nuraz B, Ata B. Conventional IVF revisited: Is ICSI better for non-male factor infertility? Randomized controlled double blind study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 19:101990. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101990 ID:2924
Year:2020, DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101990 0 8772 2020 Last edited on 23/11/2020
Supramaniam PR, Granne I, Ohuma EO, Lim LN, McVeigh E, Venkatakrishnan R, Becker CM, Mittal M. ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertility. Hum Reprod. 2020 Mar 27,35(3):583-594. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez301 ID:3251
Year:2020, DOI:10.1093/humrep/dez301 0 0 2020 Last edited on 10/4/2021

Additional References related to IVF x ICSI Comparison - [1]

Copyright IVFCPD Pty Ltd
Contact IVFCPD at Office@ivfcpd.com