IVF x ICSI Comparison for non (severe) male factor infertility. - Course ID:77 -
While ICSI was initially developed for server male factor infertility that often resulted in failed fertilisation, more recent application has seen it applied to a number of non-male factor clients. This exercise reports on publications that have teste whether this is satisfactory.
You need to be registered and subscribed to view these activities.
There are 9 key points collected on this topic but you need to have a current subscription to access them
Notes relating to this Course.
There are 1 notes collected on this topic but you need to have a current subscription to access them
References related to IVF x ICSI Comparison
Additional References related to IVF x ICSI Comparison - 
Liu L, Wang H, Li Z, Niu J, Tang R. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization in couples with nonsevere male infertility [published online ahead of print, 2020 Sep 4]. Fertil Steril. 2020,S0015-0282(20)30426-X. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.058
P R Supramaniam, I Granne, E O Ohuma, L N Lim, E McVeigh, R Venkatakrishnan, C M Becker, M Mittal, ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertility, Human Reproduction, , dez301, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez301
Grimstad FW, Nangia AK, Luke B, Stern JE, Mak W. Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2016,31(12):2750-2755. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew247