IVFCPD Courses

This site is under development.

Logon

Providing a source of professional credits.

Please contact us if you are interested in contributing to IVFCPD
IVFCPD is undergoing a major consolidation-pages may change frequently.

IVF x ICSI Comparison for non (severe) male factor infertility. - Course ID:77 -

Code

SEP53+ [822]

Comment

While ICSI was initially developed for server male factor infertility that often resulted in failed fertilisation, more recent application has seen it applied to a number of non-male factor clients. This exercise reports on publications that have teste whether this is satisfactory.

Access

You need to be registered and subscribed to view these activities.

Primary Topic

Date

7/1/2021 - [Last Updated:11/4/2021]

Status

Information

Select for more information on Education modules.

Activity	Date
Created	7/1/2021
Updated	11/4/2021
Enrolled
Last Visit
Last Activity

Contents
0	Activity ID
21	Key Topics
2	Comments
0	Questions
6	References
0	Activity
0	CPD Minutes

References

All

| Order:

Author

Year

List of Key Points

FILTER:

There are 21 key points collected on this topic but you need to have a current subscription to access them

Notes relating to this Course.
There are 2 notes collected on this topic but you need to have a current subscription to access them

References related to IVF x ICSI Comparison -[5] [Ref=6]
	P R Supramaniam, I Granne, E O Ohuma, L N Lim, E McVeigh, R Venkatakrishnan, C M Becker, M Mittal, ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertility, Human Reproduction, , dez301, https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez301					ID:2409
	Year:0, DOI:10.1093/humrep/dez301	0	8436		Last edited on
	Liu L, Wang H, Li Z, Niu J, Tang R. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilization in couples with nonsevere male infertility [published online ahead of print, 2020 Sep 4]. Fertil Steril. 2020,S0015-0282(20)30426-X. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.058					ID:2752
	Year:2020, DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.058	0	8680	2020	Last edited on
	Grimstad FW, Nangia AK, Luke B, Stern JE, Mak W. Use of ICSI in IVF cycles in women with tubal ligation does not improve pregnancy or live birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2016,31(12):2750-2755. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew247					ID:2754
	Year:0, DOI:10.1093/humrep/dew247	357	0		Last edited on
	Haas J, Miller TE, Nahum R, Aizer A, Kirshenbaum M, Zilberberg E, Lebovitz O, Orvieto R. The role of ICSI vs. conventional IVF for patients with advanced maternal age-a randomized controlled trial. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Oct 28. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01990-5					ID:2869
	Year:2020, DOI:10.1007/s10815-020-01990-5	375	8741	2020	Last edited on 30/10/2020
	Isikoglu M, Avci A, Kendirci Ceviren A, Aydı,,nuraz B, Ata B. Conventional IVF revisited: Is ICSI better for non-male factor infertility? Randomized controlled double blind study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Nov 19:101990. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101990					ID:2924
	Year:2020, DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101990	0	8772	2020	Last edited on 23/11/2020
	Supramaniam PR, Granne I, Ohuma EO, Lim LN, McVeigh E, Venkatakrishnan R, Becker CM, Mittal M. ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertility. Hum Reprod. 2020 Mar 27,35(3):583-594. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez301					ID:3251
	Year:2020, DOI:10.1093/humrep/dez301	0	0	2020	Last edited on 10/4/2021

Additional References related to IVF x ICSI Comparison - [1]

Copyright IVFCPD Pty Ltd
Contact IVFCPD	Contact IVFCPD at Office@ivfcpd.com